
The short answer: knowing whether someone read your e-mail seems useful, but it is unreliable. A read receipt depends on the recipient agreeing; the “tracking pixel” (a tiny image) is blocked or preloaded by many programs. “Open” numbers mislead. Clicks and replies count for more.
The two mechanisms
| Mechanism | What it is worth |
| Read receipt (requested in the message) | The recipient chooses whether to send it. Many refuse. It only proves someone agreed. |
| Tracking pixel (invisible image) | It counts an open when the image is requested. It fails if images are blocked. |
| Programs that preload images | Some load them on their own, without the person opening it. It inflates opens. |
| Clicks on tagged links | More reliable: someone did something. UTM links. |
| Replies | The clearest sign it was read. |
Using this well
|
|
|
|
|
| Too many images, message in spam. An e-mail with many images and tracking links looks like advertising and risks spam; a pixel that fails is not a sign the e-mail did not arrive. Use the measurement to improve the text, not to nag those who do not reply. |
| To build an HTML e-mail that displays well: HTML e-mail. To send to a list: Subscribers and newsletter. |
|
Want an opinion on how to measure your sends? Open a ticket with what you use today. Open a support ticket |
RECOMMENDED PRODUCT Professional e-mail on your domain Mailboxes in your company name, no adverts, with spam filtering. from 321,75 MT/mo (3-year plan, with coupon) See plans |
- 0 Users Found This Useful











